Ok, it's not exactly explained. However, Rachel Maddow has proffered as reasonable an explanation as any--indeed, it may look like a conspiracy theory, but it's far less crazy than the Susan Rice conspiracy theory. What happens if Susan Rice is not nominated? The GOP is suggesting that they'd confirm John Kerry for Secretary of State with no fuss. If Kerry is nominated, his senate seat opens up and Scott Brown can run for the Massachusetts seat. Worth a gander here.
Showing posts with label rachel maddow. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rachel maddow. Show all posts
Friday, November 30, 2012
Rice conspiracy explained.
Labels:
benghazi,
john kerry,
john mccain,
rachel maddow,
secretary of state,
susan rice
Wednesday, November 14, 2012
How do you measure a politician's intelligence?
Not, one would hope, by whether or no he or she can count. As I've recently posted, certain politicos are arguing that Paul Ryan should replace John Boehner as Speaker of the House. I agree with both Redstate.com and Rachel Maddow that Boehner is bad at his job. Boehner is far too weak a leader to be effective as Speaker (say what you want about Pelosi's positions, she was certainly not weak). However, Paul Ryan would not be a suitable Speaker in the least. He is certainly not weak--the man simply cannot count.
(Full article)
I continue to reject the notion of a 'mandate', but it remains the case that Romney/Ryan got walloped no matter how you look at it.
I continue to reject the notion of a 'mandate', but it remains the case that Romney/Ryan got walloped no matter how you look at it.
(NB, Romney and Ryan lost the EC by 333-206, not 232-206).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)